14. CW’s applications had been heard by Her Honour Judge Hughes over 3 days in June and November 2004.
By the period, CG had qualified as an instructor but her partner MG ended up being working at home and playing a part that is major the kids’s care. Mrs Barrow’s report confirmed that CG questioned CW’s straight to be engaged when you look at the kid’s everyday lives and ended up being in opposition to a provided residence purchase which will confer parental duty upon CW. CW had been now proposing that the young children reside together with her in Shropshire. Girls obviously enjoyed life both in domiciles. Mrs Barrow suggested the extension associated with the present plans, as well as a move towards the equal sharing of college breaks. She additionally recommended a shared residence purchase: